July 28, 2010

The Mathematics of Powerful Communication: Concrete > Abstract

by Terry Gault

This article from NPR's website makes the point that abstract communication is FAR less effective than concrete communication.

"Concrete and abstract words activate different parts of the cerebral cortex. Concrete words like hammer, hit and hard are processed more by areas at the back of the brain that handle visual and spatial information. Abstract words like justice, fairly andrender activate the frontal lobes, which process information independent of any particular sense (vision, hearing, touch)." 

How do you ensure that your communications are concrete?  Use stories, images and visual metaphors to illustrate your points.

 Subscribe here >>

photo credit: cellular immunity

Permalink Print Comment

July 21, 2010

Watch the Game Film

videotape

 by Terry Gault

This piece from FastCompany magazine highlights a practice we've been using since our inception: videotaping our clients.

Whether you are being coached on your listening, presentation, or dialogue/questioning skills, being able to see and hear exactly how you come across and to hear precisely what you did and did not say, is critical. The use of video often results in some of the most powerful feedback you will ever receive on your communication style.

So, take the advice of Dan Heath and Chip Heath in this piece titled, Watch the Game Film.

 

Check out what we're doing on Facebook  LinkedIn and Yelp, and don't forget to subscribe.

photo credit: Joi

Permalink Print Comment

July 14, 2010

A Story About Motivation

by Terry Gault

To sum up this article:
"When you want something from someone, ask yourself what story that person is trying to tell about himself (or herself), and then make sure that your role and actions are enhancing that story in the right way." 

This is helpful thinking when crafting presentations intended to motivate the audience to take action.  See this fascinating article below, by Peter Bregman.

I was walking back to our apartment in Manhattan, the hood of my jacket pulled tight to keep the rain out, when I saw an older man with a walker struggle to descend the slippery stairs of his building. When he almost fell, I and several others went over to help.

There was an Access-A-Ride van (a Metropolitan Transit Authority vehicle for people with disabilities) waiting for him. The driver was inside, warm and dry, as he watched us straining to help his passenger cross the sidewalk in the pouring rain.

Then he opened the window and yelled over the sound of the rain coming down, "He might not be able to make it today."

"Hold on," we yelled (there were five of us now) as we helped the man move around the back of the van, "he can make it."

Traffic on 84th street had stopped. We caught the man from falling a few times, hoisted him back up, and finally got him to the van door, which the driver then opened from the inside to reveal a set of stairs. The man with the walker would never make it.

"What about your side door, the one with the electric lift?" I asked.

"Oh yeah," the driver answered, "hold on." He put his coat over his head, came out in the rain with the rest of us, and operated the lift.

Once the man with the walker was in safely, we all began to move away when the driver opened the window one more time and yelled, "Thanks for your help."

So, here's my question: Why will five strangers volunteer to help a man they don't know in the pouring rain — and think about the electric lift themselves — while the paid driver sat inside and waited?

Perhaps the driver is simply a jerk? Perhaps. But I don't think so. Once we suggested the lift, he didn't resist or complain, he came outside and did it immediately. And he wasn't obnoxious either. When he thanked us for our help, he seemed sincere.

Maybe it's because the driver is not permitted to leave the vehicle? I checked the MTA website to see if there was policy against drivers assisting passengers. On the contrary, it states "As long as the driver doesn't lose sight of the vehicle and is not more than 100 feet away from it, the driver can assist you to and from the vehicle, help you up or down the curb or one step and assist you in boarding the vehicle."

So why didn't the driver help? Part of the answer is probably that for him, an old man struggling with a walker isn't a one-time thing, it's every day every stop, and the sight doesn't compel him to act.

But that answer isn't good enough. After all, it's his job to help. That's when it suddenly hit me: The reason the driver didn't help might be precisely because he was paid to.

Dan Ariely, a professor at Duke University, and James Heyman, a professor at the University of St. Thomas, explored this idea. They set up a computer with a circle on the left side of the screen and a square on the right side, and asked participants to use the mouse to drag the circle into the square. Once they did, a new circle appeared on the left. The task was to drag as many circles as they could within five minutes. More on A Story About Motivation

Permalink Print Comment

July 7, 2010

LiveStrong Messenger Award Speeches

by Terry Gault

When one of my clients sent me this video of his speech with Lance Armstrong's LiveStrong organization, I was moved and inspired.  Also, I felt proud.  Proud for whatever small role I had played in Brad's transformation.  Here's the feedback that I gave Brad after watching his video:

  • I liked the Minnesota line that he started with.  That was charming and got a nice laugh.
  • I did hear some verbal filler – uh, um, you know and so.  How to Shed Verbal Filler
  • At one point Brad puts his hands behind his back which looks a bit awkward.
    Using broad gestures gives the impression of power, confidence – comfortable in one's own skin, comfortable taking up space.
  • Brad told a compelling story about losing 80 pounds – very impressive.
  • I REALLY liked the moment when Brad started teasing Lance Armstrong, calling him short.  It was great that Lance started playing along – standing next to the guy that was shorter than he.  That demonstrated TREMENDOUS confidence and chutzpah and was a memorable moment for the audience.
  • Brad tended to only look at one spot in the audience.  Spread around the eye contact – share the love.
  • The story about Brad's mom running a marathon 9 months after a bout with cancer was extremely compelling.  He paints her as a model of courage and determination.
  • Overall, Brad comes across as very confident, appreciative, humble, admirable and likable.

When I first worked with Brad in Minneapolis in December 2000 (my coldest gig ever), he seemed anxious; not sure what his future had in store.  The Brad Stratton in this video is not only 80 pounds lighter but clearly embodies self-assurance.  Way to go, Brad!  Brad's LinkedIn profile

Subscribe to our blog here >>

Permalink Print Comment

June 29, 2010

The Hottest New Job in Public Relations: Chief Content Officer

Editor's Note:  This is a guest post by Greg Matusky Gregory FCA Communications

I'm going to make a call. In three to five years, a new member of the C-suite will emerge. He or she will work shoulder to shoulder with CMOs and CEOs. The job description will look nothing like we have ever seen. They will be called chief content officer.

 Their purpose will be to originate and share a constant stream of information flowing from inside the four walls of the corporation directly through new digital channels to partners, customers, clients, employees, prospects, and investors. Their skill set will be part journalist, part brand manager, and part public relations professional.

 They will be charged with capturing and articulating the character and voice of the company, and they will be responsible for ushering in a new era of corporate transparency — a world where outsiders can gain a true and authentic view of the company. Filters will be fewer. Responses quicker. Information will flow more freely.

 If the evolving nature of public relations is teaching us anything, it's that content is now the single most important asset at our disposal for conditioning and positioning companies for increased revenue and value. As traditional media struggles to find relevancy, more and more corporations will turn to social and digital media to communicate directly with online audiences.

 Entire new corporate domains will appear, peopled by writers, editors, videographers, podcasters, and technologists, who will work in unison to identify relevant information from inside the corporation, publish it, and then manage the pathways through which it is distributed.

 The chief content officer will stand in the shoes of a traditional publisher, delicately balancing the need for quality content to find and keep audiences against the corporation's drive to sell and promote. The created content will attain a new level of truth and authenticity.

 If a company messes up, the CCO will be charged with the clean up, addressing issues directly online. If a company struggles, that same CCO will be responsible for publishing rapid response investor information to shorten the cycle of pain, not unlike how 24/7 news channels have cut attention spans and focal points.

 And if a company wants to engage, the CCO will be tasked with finding and crystallizing information and content that can catalyze clients and customers, aggregating and engaging them through micro-topics that speak directly to narrow-band niches.

 Some companies like Ford are already starting to break this ground.  Scott Monty, the firm's Head of Social Media, has direct access to CEO Alan Mulally, and works closely with him and other executives to develop social media programs and content, and share information on social networks.

 The CCO job description will read something like this:

If you can write like a journalist, think like a marketer, and understand the vast and shifting seas of digital communications, Mega Global Corporation needs you to express our world view and communicate our value to financial and consumer markets, partners, and governments.

 You must be able to manage a worldwide editorial staff, producing both written and visual communications, and must be able to deliver daily, even hourly, content that is fully optimized to gain visibility over digital pathways.

 This individual will report directly to the CEO, but will have the strength of character to beat back corporate encroachment in favor of honest, accurate content that provides real value to worldwide audiences.

 Most important, this individual must understand how to monetize this content throughout the enterprise, converting incoming interest into business opportunities for the organization as a whole. Compensation: Name your price if you can deliver on the seemingly impossible yet urgent responsibilities described here.

 Some CMOs are taking on many of these duties now. But as our communications channels continue to expand into the digital market, companies need to disseminate content to an increasing array of online audiences. It's becoming a job unto itself. One-way communication is not enough. Companies need to inform, connect, and engage with their customers and partners in meaningful ways, wherever they live.

 Greg Matusky Gregory FCA 20 years ago after working as a freelance writer for Success magazine. As a writer his work appeared in Inc., Forbes, and Newsweek magazines before he transitioned to public relations in 1990.

photo credit: digitalbob8

Subscribe to Speakfearlessly>>

Permalink Print Comment

June 22, 2010

BP Spills Coffee

by Terry Gault

This is hilarious!

Permalink Print Comment

June 20, 2010

Self-Improvement that Sticks

This terrific advice from our partner Brilliance Inc, applies beautifully to the process of evolving one's communication style, too.

How are those New Year’s Resolutions coming along?

By now, you must be a nicer, calmer, healthier, happier, more productive version of yourself, right?

If you are falling a bit short of your lofty resolutions, read on and learn how to make self improvement really stick.

The Good News About Self-Improvement

Anyone can change their thoughts, behaviors, and habits. Despite past claims that adult brains were fixed, findings over the last decade reveal that brains constantly adjust to inputs. Neuroplasticity–the brain’s constant adaptation–means that you can teach any (willing) dog new tricks.

The Bad News About Self-Improvement

It’s not as fast or as easy as we might like. In an ideal world, you’d pick something about yourself to improve, do a little homework–read a book, attend a class, or watch a YouTube video–and voila, a new improved you! Unfortunately it’s not that easy.  When faced with challenges that conspire to take us off track, we may give in to inertia and settle for the latest version of ourselves. A little crack appears in our soul, patched with guilt and excuses.

HOW IT WORKS

Real Tools for Change
Deeply felt, lasting change happens over time. Below are some phases of change and corresponding tools to help you upgrade the software running on your grey-matter platform.  All these tools are instantly available simply by setting an intention to use them.

Five phases to making self-improvement stick:

1.       Discovery and Intake
2.       Design
3.       Launch Beta Version of You
4.       Test for Quality
5.       Launch Upgrade Version of You

Permalink Print Comment

June 14, 2010

Store d'oeuvres

By Terry Gault

I've really enjoyed these daily emails from the Urban Dictionary.  As I have personally eaten said "store d'oeuvres", this one made me laugh out loud.  Enjoy!

June 14: store d'oeuvres

Snacks and food samples that a grocery store will serve at various locations in order to tempt the patrons into buying something they weren't planning on (pizza, chips and dip, sausage, etc.). Usually happens on the weekend.

I went to Costco the other day and filled up on store d'oeuvres.

photo credit: dickuhne

Presentation and Communication Tips and Techniques>>

Permalink Print Comment

June 2, 2010

10 Highest-Paid Public Speakers In the World

Editor's Note:  This is a guest post by Online Universities.com

How much would you pay to see your favorite celebrity, politician or business leader speak? For some businesses and organizations, the answer is a lot more than you’d expect. Here, we’ve pulled together some of the biggest payouts ever made for keynote speakers, though it has to be said that it may not be a definitive list as some speakers don’t disclose their fees openly. You may be surprised to learn what some of the big names earn for a few hours of work as you work your way through this list. You might even be compelled to change your own college major to public speaking.

  1. Donald Trump, $1-1.5 million: In 2006 and 2007, The Learning Annex shelled out a hefty fee to have Donald Trump at their Real Estate Wealth Expos, paying him a whopping $1.5 million per speech for a 17-seminar conference. Trump only had to speak for an hour at each one, but audience members say he gave them their money’s worth by staying to answer audience questions. This was after Trump had already raked in one million per speech speaking at the same seminars in 2005. The company felt Trump was well worth the money, however, as few others have the celebrity and business savvy he does.
  2. Ronald Reagan, $1 million: Back in 1989, the Fujisankei Communications Group in Japan paid this former president a cool million per speech to come to the country and tour. Reagan gave two speeches while there as well as speaking at media outlets and giving interviews. Still, Reagan didn’t make out too shabby with $2 million (in 1989 dollars) under his belt for sharing his business and presidential experience with the company desperately in need of public relations help. The Reagans created a national sensation in Japan, boosting the company’s profile.
  3. Tony Blair, $616,000: On a lecture by lecture basis, Blair is likely the world’s best paid speaker. In 2009, he made almost $616,000 for two half-hour speeches given in the Philippines, raking in over $10,000 a minute. Listeners didn’t get to hear what he had to say for free, however, and many tickets to the event topped $500. Even in a time of economic crisis when many have slashed their fees, Blair’s have remained buoyant, due perhaps to his lengthy stint as Prime Minister and the insight and analysis he can offer as a result of it.
  4. Bill Clinton, $150,000- $450,000: It isn’t unusual for this former president to net $150,000 and up for a speech. Clinton has spoken at a wide range of events around the world from environmental conferences to business meetings, often promoting causes like HIV/AIDS treatment, economic empowerment and leadership development. The same charisma and likeability that won him two elections likely contribute to organizations’ willingness to shell out the big bucks to have him speak. Clinton has scaled back his speaking schedule, however, to support his wife as Secretary of State.
  5. Rudy Guilani, $270,000: While millions of New Yorkers got to hear Guiliani speak for free during his time as mayor, his speaking fees aren’t cheap now that he’s retired. Since his time in office, he’s earned nearly $10 million in speaking fees, with his most expensive gig netting him $217,000. This speech was given at Sage Capital, a St. Louis-based private equity firm, and chances are his presidential candidacy may have helped out the bottom line on his fees as well.
  6. Alan Greenspan, $250,000: Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan has been able to bring in the bucks since retiring through giving speeches. Only a week after his retirement, Greenspan spoke at a Lehman Brothers dinner, earning himself $250,000. Worth noting is that his successor to the position, Ben Bernacke, won’t even make that in his first year on the job, earning just $191,000.
  7. Lance Armstrong, $100,000 and up: Straight facts are hard to get on just what Armstrong is paid to appear as a keynote speaker. With inspirational fodder gained both from his successful battle against cancer and his comeback win of the Tour de France, Armstrong is in demand as a speaker regardless of the kind of fees he commands. While he might only need $100,000 to appear at some events, industry insiders have noted that he asked for $750,000 for a series of speeches given overseas just last year, a fee that might not be out of line for celebrity speakers.
  8. Al Gore, $100,000-150,000: Since his time as Vice President and his famous run for president, Al Gore has made a name for himself as a strong opponent of global warming and an environmental activist. Gore has maintained his draw as a speaker because of this activism, and now routinely charges in the $100,000 range for speeches. Having an Oscar-winning film and a Nobel Peace Prize under his belt sure can’t hurt either. While some have criticized his high fees, his camp maintains that he donates a percentage of his fees to the Alliance for Climate Protection.
  9. Richard Branson, $100,000 and up: This business mogul is known world wide for his record company and airlines, not to mention his forward-thinking business plans. It is, perhaps, a combination of these things–his business savvy, willingness to take risks, and ultimate success–that make him such a desirable speaker. Of course, if you want to bring him to your event, expect to pay at least $100,000, though many other companies have been rumored to have paid more.
  10. Sarah Palin, $100,000 and up: A few years ago, few people outside of Alaska had any idea who Sarah Palin was. Now, a presidential race and loads of media attention later, Palin is a household name, and she is capitalizing on it big time. Who can blame her, however, when she can command $100,000 and more for a speech? Since leaving office as governor, Palin has brought in nearly $12 million in book royalties, speaking fees and soon, a reality TV show.

Check out what we're doing on Facebook  LinkedIn and Yelp, and don't forget to subscribe.

photo credit: Chris Denbow
Permalink Print 1 Comment

May 24, 2010

Complete Communicator – June 2010, San Francisco

Once a quarter The Henderson Group holds a "By Invitation Only" Complete Communicator workshop in San Francisco, led by our VP of Services, Terry Gault.  The next one is scheduled for June 24-25, 2010.

Our work has to be experienced to truly understand its value.  We use these workshops as a way to introduce our work experientially to new prospective clients.
Permalink Print Comment
Login